{"id":701,"date":"2026-02-04T08:54:33","date_gmt":"2026-02-04T07:54:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/souverainete-suisse.ch\/?p=701"},"modified":"2026-02-04T08:54:33","modified_gmt":"2026-02-04T07:54:33","slug":"the-cjue-no-longer-judges-the-law-but-imposes-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/test.souverainete-suisse.ch\/en\/2026\/02\/the-cjue-no-longer-judges-the-law-but-imposes-it\/","title":{"rendered":"The CJEU no longer judges the law: it imposes it"},"content":{"rendered":"

When an unelected court imposes on a state what its constitution explicitly prohibits, it is no longer an interpretation of the law but a confiscation of political power. The latest CJEU decision crosses a red line: under the guise of freedom of movement, it transforms European judges into ideological legislators, relegating the sovereignty of peoples and national Constitutions to the status of obstacles to be circumvented.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

There are precedent-setting rulings.<\/p>\n

And others that are taking Europe out of the law.<\/p>\n

The latest Court of Justice of the European Union<\/strong> is a perfect illustration of this: in the name of \u00abfreedom of movement\u00bb, the Court of Luxembourg requires a State to recognise a person as a \"national of another State\". wedding<\/em> a union it has never recognised, never voted for, never enshrined in its Constitution.<\/p>\n

Poland has been asked to consider as married two nationals who were united in Germany, even though its Constitution explicitly defines marriage as the union of a man and a woman.<\/p>\n

The CJEU claims to respect national competences... while in fact annulling them.<\/p>\n

It is a legal dispossession disguised as a technical interpretation.<\/p>\n

A well-oiled machine: bypassing peoples, neutralising Constitutions<\/h3>\n

This judgement is no accident. It is part of a coherent strategy:<\/p>\n